A study on the importance of sustainable environmental management strategies for oil and gas construction projects: a systematic review

Authors

  • Viswanadha Reddy Maddi Department of Environmental Studies, Arunodaya University, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2281-4485/16012

Keywords:

Sustainable development, hydrocarbon resources, oil and gas projects, environmental criteria, economic criteria , social criteria

Abstract

From the Arctic to the desert, the tropical rainforest to the temperate woodland, and even the mangroves and offshore areas, the oil and gas industry truly spans the globe. The main objective of the study is to examine the importance of sustainable environmental management strategies for oil and gas construction projects. The study also focuses on waste management in industrial construction and the contributions of industrial ecology. In addition, the study also examines risk assessment in oil and gas construction projects by considering DEMATEL-ANP. In conclusion, the study focuses on the importance of environmental management in the corporate governance of oil and gas producers.

References

Agarwal, M. A., & Choudhary, V. (2022). Study on a Proactive Approach towards Environment Management in Oil and Gas Industry.

Alfadil, M. O., Kassem, M. A., Ali, K. N., & Alaghbari, W. (2022). Construction industry from perspective of force majeure and environmental risk compared to the CoViD-19 outbreak: a systematic literature review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1135.

Arbolino, R., De Simone, L., Carlucci, F., Yigitcanlar, T., & Ioppolo, G. (2018). Towards a sustainable industrial ecology: Implementation of a novel approach in the performance evaluation of Italian regions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 220-236.

Beasley, K. P. (2000, June). Environmental Management System of the Bolivia-Brazil Pipeline Project. In SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production. OnePetro.

Bhutta, A. I., Ullah, M. R., Sultan, J., Riaz, A., & Sheikh, M. F. (2022). Impact of green energy production, green innovation, financial development on environment quality: a role of country governance in Pakistan. Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy, 12, 316-326.

Cherepovitsyn, A., Tsvetkova, A., & Komendantova, N. (2020). Approaches to assessing the strategic sustainability of high-risk offshore oil and gas projects. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8(12), 995.

Dhoraisingam Samuel, S., Mahenthiran, S., & Ramasamy, R. (2022). CSR Disclosures, CSR Awards and Corporate Governance as Determinants of the Cost of Debt: Evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Financial Studies, 10(4), 87.

Farooq, M., Cheng, J., Khan, N. U., Saufi, R. A., Kanwal, N., & Bazkiaei, H. A. (2022). Sustainable Waste Management Companies with Innovative Smart Solutions: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Model. Sustainability, 14(20), 13146.

Freitas, L. A., & Magrini, A. (2017). Waste management in industrial construction: Investigating contributions from industrial ecology. Sustainability, 9(7), 1251.

García‐Sánchez, I. M., Hussain, N., Khan, S. A., & Martínez‐Ferrero, J. (2022). Assurance of corporate social responsibility reports: Examining the role of internal and external corporate governance mechanisms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(1), 89-106.

Ghaffar, S. H., Burman, M., & Braimah, N. (2020). Pathways to circular construction: An integrated management of construction and demolition waste for resource recovery. Journal of cleaner production, 244, 118710.

Guo, J., Xiang, P., Wang, X., & Lee, Y. (2022). Predicting and managing megaproject gray rhino risks with IF-ANP and DEMATEL based on panel data. Expert Systems with Applications, 208, 118243.

Handfield, R. B., Primo, M., & Oliveira, M. P. V. D. (2015). The role of effective relationship management in successful large oil and gas projects: Insights from procurement executives. Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation, 1(1), 15-41.

Hatema, Z. M., Kassemc, M. A., Alic, K. N., & Khoiryd, M. A. (2022). A New Perspective on the Relationship Between the Construction Industry Performance and The Economy Outcome-A Literature Review. J. Kejuruter, 34, 191-200.

He, Q. R., & Chen, P. K. (2022). Developing a green supplier evaluation system for the Chinese semiconductor manufacturing industry based on supplier willingness. Operations Management Research, 1-18.

Hond, F. D. (2000). Industrial ecology: a review. Regional Environmental Change, 1(2), 60-69.

Ikuru, S. E., & Orlu, C. (2022). Good Governance and Environmental Sustainability in Rivers State, 2015-2021. American Journal of Social and Humanitarian Research, 3(5), 53-67.

Kamranfar, S., Azimi, Y., Gheibi, M., Fathollahi-Fard, A. M., & Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M. (2022). Analyzing green construction development barriers by a hybrid decision-making method based on DEMATEL and the ANP. Buildings, 12(10), 1641.

Kemp, D. (2010). Community relations in the global mining industry: exploring the internal dimensions of externally orientated work. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(1), 1-14.

Kenzong, B., Bitondo, D., Tamfuh, P. A., Kameni, G. S. K., Vounang, J. G., Enang, R. K., ... & Bitom, D. (2022). Assessing and Mapping Land Suitability Units for Maize (Zea mays L) Production Using Integrated DEMATEL-ANP Model and GIS in the Foumbot Agricultural Basin (Cameroon Western Highlands). Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 10(6), 57-85.

Kering, N. C. (2016). The national environmental management authority's capacity to manage and control the potential environmental impact of the emerging oil and gas sector.

Knizhnikov, A. Y., Shvarts, E. A., Pakhalov, A., Rozhkova, N., & McCann, M. Environmental (2022) transparency of global oil and gas companies: An independent comparative assessment. In Routledge Handbook of the Extractive Industries and Sustainable Development (pp. 367-385). Routledge.

Lèbre, É., & Corder, G. (2015). Integrating industrial ecology thinking into the management of mining waste. Resources, 4(4), 765-786.

Li, H., Han, Z., Zhang, J., Philbin, S. P., Liu, D., & Ke, Y. (2022). Systematic Identification of the Influencing Factors for the Digital Transformation of the Construction Industry Based on LDA-DEMATEL-ANP. Buildings, 12(9), 1409.

Li, X., Ran, Y., Zhang, G., & He, Y. (2022). Maintenance strategy selection: A multi-criteria group decision-making method based on cloud DEMATEL-ANP.

Lin, W. C. (2022). Maritime Environment Assessment and Management Using through Balanced Scorecard by Using DEMATEL and ANP Technique. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(5), 2873.

Mak, T. M., Xiong, X., Tsang, D. C., Iris, K. M., & Poon, C. S. (2020). Sustainable food waste management towards a circular economy: Policy review, limitations, and opportunities. Bioresource Technology, 297, 122497.

Mariyam, S., Cochrane, L., Zuhara, S., & McKay, G. (2022). Waste Management in Qatar: A Systematic Literature Review and Recommendations for System Strengthening. Sustainability, 14(15), 8991.

Nasri, S. A., Ehsani, B., Hosseininezhad, S. J., & Safaie, N. (2022). A sustainable supplier selection method using integrated Fuzzy DEMATEL–ANP–DEA approach (case study: Petroleum Industry). Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-37.

NWOKIKE, L. I. (2022). THE NEXUS BETWEEN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS OF OIL AND GAS COMPANIES: NEED FOR LEGAL FRAMEWORK. LAW AND SOCIAL JUSTICE REVIEW, 3(1).

Onkila, T., & Sarna, B. (2022). A systematic literature review on employee relations with CSR: State of art and future research agenda. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(2), 435-447.

Pauliuk, S., Koslowski, M., Madhu, K., Schulte, S., & Kilchert, S. (2022). Co-design of digital transformation and sustainable development strategies-What socio-metabolic and industrial ecology research can contribute. Journal of Cleaner Production, 343, 130997.

Purwanti, S., Abdoellah, O. S., Asdak, C., & Cahyandito, M. F. (2022, November). Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Model for the Environment at Oil and Gas Companies in North Kalimantan. In International Conference on Communication, Policy and Social Science (InCCluSi 2022) (pp. 12-18). Atlantis Press.

Qian, W., Zhu, P., & Tilt, C. (2022). Corporate environmental disclosure and local government environmental oversight in China. Pacific Accounting Review.

Rostamzadeh, S., Abouhossein, A., Chalak, M. H., Vosoughi, S., & Norouzi, R. (2022). An integrated DEMATEL-ANP approach for identification and prioritization of factors affecting falls from height accidents in construction industry. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, (just-accepted), 1-31.

Saavedra, Y. M., Iritani, D. R., Pavan, A. L., & Ometto, A. R. (2018). Theoretical contribution of industrial ecology to circular economy. Journal of cleaner production, 170, 1514-1522.

Shahabi, R. S., Basiri, M. H., Qarahasanlou, A. N., Mottahedi, A., & Dehghani, F. (2022). Fuzzy MADM-Based Model for Prioritization of Investment Risk in Iran’s Mining Projects. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 24(7), 3189-3207.

Shooshtarian, S., Maqsood, T., Caldera, S., & Ryley, T. (2022). Transformation towards a circular economy in the Australian construction and demolition waste management system. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 30, 89-106.

Tsai, P. H., Wang, Y. W., & Kao, H. S. (2022). Applying DEMATEL-ANP approach to explore the intention to hold roadside wedding banquets in Penghu: A consumers’ perspective. Evaluation and Program Planning, 95, 102172.

Zhu, F., Hu, H., & Xu, F. (2022). Risk assessment model for international construction projects considering risk interdependence using the DEMATEL method. Plos one, 17(5), e0265972.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-25

How to Cite

Maddi, V. R. (2022). A study on the importance of sustainable environmental management strategies for oil and gas construction projects: a systematic review. EQA - International Journal of Environmental Quality, 51(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2281-4485/16012

Issue

Section

Articles