Comparative assessment of physico-chemical conditions and zooplankton diversity of Anambra River in Anambra State, Nigeria

Authors

  • Jonathan Chimezie Anyanwu Department of Environmental Management, Federal University of Technology, Owerri
  • Daniel Madueke Nwafor Department of Environmental Management, Federal University of Technology, Owerri
  • Chijioke Ndukwe Uyo Department of Environmental Management, Federal University of Technology, Owerri
  • Chris Chibuzor Ejiogu Department of Environmental Management, Federal University of Technology, Owerri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2281-4485/16319

Keywords:

Anthropogenic, Deterioration, Diversity, Physicochemical, Zooplankton

Abstract

An assessment of Physico-chemical parameters and zooplankton diversity of Anambra River in Anambra State was conducted for a period of eight months from February 2021-September 2021. Water samples were collected from three sampling stations of the river every month in sterilized containers during the course of the study. The study stations are Umueri (S1), Anam (S2) and Otuocha (S3). The samples were analysed for both Physico-chemical attributes and zooplankton diversity. Zooplankton species were determined following standard procedures. A total of twenty three species of zooplankton were encountered in Anambra River. The abundance of zooplankton in Anambra was in the order: Protozoa (28.57%) > Crustacea (27.14%) > Insecta (26.67%) > Rotifera (17.62%). There were 66, 79 and 65 zooplanktons recorded for Station 1 (S1), Station 2 (S2) and Station 3 (S3) respectively in Anambra River. 8 zooplankton species cut across the 3 stations while 1(Lacane species), 2(Chaoborus species and Microcodon species) and 1(Sphaerophysa species) species were unique to Station 1 (S1), Station 2 (S2) and Station 3 (S3), respectively. Anambra River recorded high diversity indices value for Cruataceans = 1.779 and least value for Rotifera = 0.6365. The physico-chemical attributes of the river were investigated by measuring the degree of correlation with the plankton diversity. The zooplankton diversity of the river correlated significantly (p<0.05) with physico-chemical parameters. The result revealed a deterioration of water quality of the river due to industrial, commercial and anthropogenic activities. The status of zooplankton diversity of Anambra River was low indicating that the river is highly polluted and the water chemistry has direct effect on plankton diversity. Rotifera showed less number of zooplankton abundance in most of the sites in the river. Nutrient enrichment of the river, as a result of farming activities, industries, discharge of domestic wastes and effluents, has altered the structure of zooplankton community of the river. There is need for urgent management and conservation strategies to protect and restore the water quality of the river.

References

AHMAD U., PARVEEN S., KHAN A.A., KABIR H.A., MOLA H.R.A., GANAI A.H. (2011) Zooplankton population in relation to physicochemical factors of a sewage fed pond of Aligarh (UP), India. Biology and Medicine, 3(2):336-341. ISSN:09748369

ALAHUHTA J., ERŐS T., KÄRNÄ O-M., SOININEN J., WANG J., HEINO J. (2019) Understanding environmental change through the lens of trait-based, functional, and phylogenetic biodiversity in freshwater ecosystems. Environ Rev., 27(2):263–273. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2018-0071

ARIMORO F., OGANAH A. (2010) Zooplankton community responses in a perturbed tropical stream in the Niger Delta, Nigeria. The Open Environmental and Biological Monitoring Journal, 3: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.2174/1875040001003010001

CHAPARRO G., O'FARRELL I., HEIN T. (2019) Multi-scale Analysis of Functional Plankton Diversity in Floodplain Wetlands: Effects of River Regulation. Sci. Total En-viron. 667, 338–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.147

CONNELLY N.A., O’NEILL C.R., KNUTH B.A., BROWN T.L. (2007) Economic impacts of zebra mussels on drinking water treatment and electric power generation facilities. Environmental Management, 40:105–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-006-0296-5.

CUHEL R.L., AGUILAR C. (2013) Ecosystem transformations of the Laurentian Great Lake Michigan by nonindigenous biological invaders. Annual Review of Marine Sci-ence, 5:289–320. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-120710-100952.

DUDGEON D., ARTHINGTON A.H., GESSNER M.O., KAWABATA Z.I., KNOWLER D.J., LEVEQUE C., NAIMAN R.J., PRIEUR-RICHARD A-H., SOTO D., STIASSNY M.L.J. (2006) Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc., 81(2):163–182. https:// 10.1017/S1464793105006950.

EISNER L.B., NAPP J.M., MIER K.L., PINCHUK A.I., ANDREWS A.G. (2014) Climate-mediated changes in zooplankton community structure for the Eastern Bering Sea. Deep-Sea Res. 109:157–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.d sr2.2014.03.004

EL-BASSAT R.A., TAYLOR W.D. (2007) The zooplankton community of Lake Abo Zaabal, a newly-formed mining lake in Cairo, Egypt. African Journal of Aquatic Science, 32(2):1- 8. https://doi.org/10.2989/AJAS.2007.32.2.10.207

ESENOWO I.K., UGWUMBA A.A.A., AKPAN A.U. (2017) Evaluating the Physico-chemical Characteristics and Plankton Diversity of Nwaniba River, South-South Nigeria. Asian Journal of Environment & Ecology, 5(3):1-8. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJEE/2017/39038

FOUZIA I., AMIR K. (2013) Comparative Assessment of Physico-chemical conditions and Plankton diversity of River Tons and Asan in Dehradun District of Uttarakhand. Advances in Applied Science Research, 4(2):342-355. ISSN: 0976-8610

GEIST J. (2011) Integrative freshwater ecology and biodiversity conservation. Ecol Indicat., 11(6):1507–1516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.002

GOLLASCH S. (2006) Overview on introduced aquatic species in European naviga-tional and adjacent waters. Helgoland Marine Research, 60:84–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10152-006-0022-y

HAYS G.C., RICHARDSON A.J., ROBINSON C. (2005) Climate change and marine plankton. TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution, 20(6):337-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.03.004

IMOOBE T.O.Y., ADEYINKA, M.L. (2009) Zooplankton-based assessment of the trophic state of a tropical forest river in Nigeria. Archives of Biological Sciences, Belgrade, 61 (4):733-740. https://doi.org/10.2298/ABS0904733I

JEJE C.Y., FERNANDO C.H. (1986) A Practical Guide to the Identification of Nigerian Zooplankton (Cladocera, Copepoda, and Rotifera). Published by Kainji Lake Research Institute (KLRI), New Bussa.

KUMAR M., KHARE P.K. (2015) Diversity of plankton and their seasonal variation of density in the Yamuna River at Kalpi, District Jalaun, U. P. India. Journal of Global Biosciences, 4(7):2720-2729. ISSN 2320-1355

MAKAREWICZ J.C., BERTRAM P., LEWIS T.W. (1998) Changes in phytoplankton size-class abundance and species composition coinciding with chemistry and zooplankton community structure of Lake Michigan, 1983 to 1992. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 24(3): 637- 657. ISSN 0380-1330

MEENA K., PRAHLAD D. (2018) A critical review of zooplanktonic studies of Lentic water bodies of India. Int. journal of environmental sciences, 7(3):79-83. ISSN: 2277-1948 OGBEIBU A.E. (2001) Distribution, density and diversity of dipterans in a temporary pond in Okumu forest reserve southern Nigeria. Tropical Ecology, 42(2):259–268. https://doi.org/10.4314/jas.v16i1.20002

PENNAK R.W. (1978) Freshwater invertebrates of united studies. 2nd Edn., John wiley and sopejler,B.(1946)- Regional ecological studies of Swedish fresh water zooplankton Zool. Bidrag. Uppsala, 36:407-515. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1980. 25.2.0383a

PIMENTEL D., ZUNIGA R., D. MORRISON D. (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol. Econ. 52:273–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.002

PRIYANKA MALHOTRA (2014) Species Diversity and Distribution of Zooplankton of Western Yamuna Canal in Yamunanagar (Haryana) India with Special Reference to Industrial Pollution. International Research Journal of Environment Sciences, 3(8): 61-63. E-ISSN: 2319-1414

SHAHIN M. (2002) Hydrology and water resources of Africa. Springer. pp. 307–309. ISBN 1-4020-0866-X.

SHARMA B.K. (2011) Zooplankton diversity of two floodplain lakes (pats) of Manipur, Northeast India. Opuscula Zoologica, 42(2):185-197. http://opuscula-zoologica-42-2-185-197

SHARMA K. N., MANKODI P.C. (2011) Study on plankton diversity of Narmada River, Gujrat. Journal of current sciences, 16 (1):111-116. ISSN: 0972-6101

TACKX M.L.M., PAUW N.D., MIEGHEM R.V., AZEMAR F., HANNOUTI A., DAMME S. V., FIERS F., DARO N., MEIRE P. (2004) Zooplankton in the Schelde Estuary, Belgium and The Netherland. Spatial and temporal patterns. Journal of Plankton Research, 26(2): 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbh016

WIJEYARATNE W.M.D.N., NANAYAKKARA D.B.M. (2020) Monitoring of Water Quality Variation Trends in a Tropical Urban Wetland System Located within a Ram-sar Wetland City: A GIS and Phytoplankton Based Assessment. Environ. Nanotech-nology, Monit. Manage, 14:100323. https://doi.or/10.1016/j.enmm.2020.100323

XIONG W, LI J, CHEN Y, SHAN B, WANG W, ZHAN A. (2016). Determinants of community structure of zooplankton in heavily polluted river ecosystems. Sci Rep. 6(1):22043–22243. https://doi.or/10.1038/srep22043

Downloads

Published

2023-04-03

How to Cite

Anyanwu, J. C., Nwafor, D. M., Uyo, C. N., & Ejiogu, C. C. (2023). Comparative assessment of physico-chemical conditions and zooplankton diversity of Anambra River in Anambra State, Nigeria. EQA - International Journal of Environmental Quality, 53(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2281-4485/16319

Issue

Section

Articles