MAPPING SOIL SPATIAL VARIABILITY AT HIGH DETAIL BY PROXIMAL SENSORS FOR A VINEYARD PLANNING

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2281-4485/7890

Keywords:

Electromagnetic induction, gamma-ray spectroscopy, soil hydrology, carbonates, land preparation, viticulture

Abstract

Planning new vineyard needs accurate information about soil features and their spatial variability. The use of soil proximal sensors, coupled by few detailed soil observations and analysis allows to obtain high detailed maps of soil variability at affordable costs. The work showed the methodology to interpolate the proximal sensors data and to delineate homogeneous area by clustering, corresponding to likely soil units. The description and analysis of one profile for each homogeneous area allowed to describe the soil features of each soil typological units and to produce useful thematic maps for vineyard planning.      

References

BONFANTE A., AGRILLO A., ALBRIZIO R., BASILE A., BUONOMO R., DE MASCELLIS R., GAMBUTI A., GIORIO P., GUIDA G., LANGELLA G., MANNA P., MINIERI L., MOIO L., SIANI T., TERRIBILE F. (2015). Functional homogeneous zones (fHZs) in viticultural zoning procedure: an Italian case study on Aglianico vine. Soil, 1(1), 427.

DOOLITTLE J., PETERSEN M., WHEELER T. (2001). Comparison of two electromagnetic induction tools in salinity appraisals. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 56(3), 257-262.

GEBBERS R., LÜCK E., DABAS M. (2009). Comparing of instruments for geoelectrical soil mapping at the field scale. Near Surface Geophys. 7(3):179–190.

IUSS WORKING GROUP WRB (2014). World Reference Base for soil resource 2014. World Soil Resources Reports n. 106, FAO, Rome (Italy).

McNEIL J. D. 1990. Geonics EM38 ground conductivity meter: EM38 operating manual. Geonics Limited, Ontario, Canada.

ORTUANI B., CHIARADIA E. A., PRIORI S., L'ABATE G., CANONE D.,

COMUNIAN A., GIUDICI M., MELE M., FACCHI, A. (2016). Mapping Soil Water Capacity Through EMI Survey to Delineate Site-Specific Management Units Within an Irrigated Field. Soil Science, 181(6), 252-263.

PRIORI S., FANTAPPIÈ M., MAGINI S., COSTANTINI E. A. C. (2013). Using the ARP-03 for high-resolution mapping of calcic horizons. International Agrophysics, 27(3), 313-321.

PRIORI S., BIANCONI N., COSTANTINI E. A. (2014). Can γ-radiometrics predict soil textural data and stoniness in different parent materials? A comparison of two machine-learning methods. Geoderma, 226, 354-364.

REYNOLDS W. D., ELRICK D. E. (1985). In situ measurement of field-saturated hydraulic conductivity, sorptivity, and the α-parameter using the Guelph permeameter. Soil Science, 140(4), 292-302.

SAXTON, K. E., RAWLS, W. J. (2006). Soil water characteristic estimates by texture and organic matter for hydrologic solutions. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 70(5), 1569-1578.

SCHOENEBERGER, P. J. (2002). Field Book for Describing and Sampling Soils: Version 2.0 (No. 631.47). National Soil Survey Center, Natural Resources Conservation Service.

STEPHENS D., DIESING M. (2014). A comparison of supervised classification methods for the prediction of substrate type using multibeam acoustic and legacy grain-size data. PloS one, 9(4), e93950.

TAYLOR J.A., COULUMA G., LAGACHERIE P., TISSEYRE B. (2009). Mapping soil units within a vineyard using statistics associated with high-resolution apparent soil electrical conductivity data and factorial discriminant analysis. Geoderma, 153, 278-284.

VAN EGMOND F.M., LOONSTRA E.H., LIMBURG J., 2008. Gamma-ray sensor for topsoil mapping: The Mole. 1st Global workshop on High Resolution Digital Soil Sensing & Mapping, 5–8 February 2008, Sydney, Australia.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-18

How to Cite

Priori, S. (2018). MAPPING SOIL SPATIAL VARIABILITY AT HIGH DETAIL BY PROXIMAL SENSORS FOR A VINEYARD PLANNING. EQA - International Journal of Environmental Quality, 30, 9–15. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2281-4485/7890